FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE: A Must-Read Book

My son, Tim Baldwin, is a constitutional attorney and historian. And now, after reading his just-released book, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, I learned something else about him: he is quite the scholar and decided to write my essay for you. I dare say his new book, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, rivals any great textbook of law and history written during the last hundred years. And I am not saying that because he is my son. I am saying that because it is the truth.

Tim’s book is not for pussyfooters. It is not a book designed for light, casual reading. The book, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, is an in-depth and exhaustive manual of American law and history (of over 500 pages) that should be read by every serious lover of liberty–especially those who call themselves Christians! The footnotes, alone, would make for a greater-than-average-size book and are chock-full of historical quotations and references.

Recommending the book, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, are best-selling author Jerome Corsi (“The Late Great USA” and “The Obama Nation,” etc.) and retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel, author (“God & Caesar” and “Christianity and the Constitution,” etc.), and professor of constitutional law at Thomas Goode Jones School of Law in Montgomery, Alabama, John Eidsmoe. Retired Air Force Brigadier General Charles E. Jones III penned the book’s foreword.

Dr. Corsi said this about Tim’s book: “FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE is a must read for any American who wants to see a restoration and revival of freedom. Timothy Baldwin’s research and exposition of the principles of freedom come straight from the sources that America’s founding fathers read and used. It is certainly time that America experiences this FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE!”

Colonel Eidsmoe said, “FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE stands out among other books because of Baldwin’s meticulous research, quotation, and documentation from the founding fathers’ own writings, and from the sources they studied–Blackstone, Montesquieu, Locke, Grotius, Sidney, and above all, the Bible. Baldwin interacts with these sources and contrasts the original understanding of government with the usurpations of government officials today. Baldwin’s analysis is clear, comprehensive, and convincing. To understand where America went wrong and what we Americans can do about it, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE is vital reading!”

From the foreword, General Jones writes, “Author Timothy Baldwin studiously wrote FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE with great wisdom, understanding, and insight as he developed and expounded a complete and comprehensive picture of what made America free and what it will take to keep it free. FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE is a necessary read for all politicians, constitutional scholars, and freedom-first citizens.”

General Jones also wrote, “When the contents of FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE are digested and applied, they will undoubtedly play a large part in the recovery of our once great republic.”

Tim superbly reveals how America’s Founding Fathers weaved the principles of the natural and revealed laws of God into the very foundation and fabric of our nation’s formation. His research into the writings and public statements of America’s founders is masterful! After reading Tim’s book, no honest, objective reader–Christian or not–will be able to refute the facts and documentation proving America’s founding as a nation of “free and independent states” under the natural and revealed laws of God.

The 4th chapter of FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, alone, is worth the price of the book. The chapter is titled “Understanding Government.” Tim rightly expounds upon the truism that one cannot rightly understand the nature of government who does not understand the nature of man or the nature of God. He brilliantly proves that America’s founders clearly understood all of the above and predicated our Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, and Bill of Rights upon this sagacious understanding. He meticulously unveils the principles of life, self-preservation and defense, reason, knowledge, freedom, and peace. He delves deeply into the propensity of government to oppress and enslave. And he spares no space in demonstrating the importance of understanding the nature of God in the formation and perpetuation of good government–something the vast majority of scholars and historians overlook.

Chapter 7, entitled “Government’s Purpose,” chapter 9, entitled “Government Administrators: Their Qualifications,” and chapter 10, entitled “Government Administrators: Their Limits,” are also crucial to understanding the principles that preserve and maintain liberty.

Christians, especially, will find Tim’s in-depth analysis of the Biblical teaching found in Romans 13 regarding submission to governmental authority extremely enlightening. If for no other reason, every pastor and Christian in America should read FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE in order to gain a true, Biblical understanding of this vitally important subject. In this regard, chapter 12, entitled “Submission To Government,” is, without question, the very best analysis of the subject that I have ever read–bar none! Oh! How I wish every pastor in America would read this chapter!

Chapter 13, entitled “Resistance to Unlawful Government,” is also worth the price of the book. It is the concluding chapter before four Appendixes that include the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and two chapters written by Tim’s dad (me), which chronicle a burgeoning New World Order currently underway.

Here are the 13 chapter titles:

1. The Starting Point: The Thought Process
2. The Foundation: Natural and Revealed Laws
3. Responsibilities Derived from Natural and Revealed Laws
4. Understanding Government
5. Government Formation
6. Government Administrators: Of, By, and For the People
7. Government’s Purpose
8. Government’s Administration
9. Government Administrators: Their Qualifications
10. Government Administrators: Their Limits
11. Ordination of Government
12. Submission to Government
13. Resistance to Unlawful Government

Tim’s book, FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE, may be obtained by going to Amazon.com

I urge everyone reading this column to immediately purchase Tim Baldwin’s phenomenally researched book of American history entitled FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE. Without a doubt, after reading it, you will be the one who is changed.

(c) Chuck Baldwin

Posted in General | Comments Off on FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE: A Must-Read Book

Governor Rell: Initial Hours of ‘Earl’ Proceeding Much as Expected

Governor M. Jodi Rell this evening said Hurricane Earl’s initial brush with Connecticut has gone much as expected, adding that the state has benefitted in many ways from the storm’s gradual weakening and north-northeast track.

      Governor Rell this morning activated the state’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Key state agencies have been at full readiness since Thursday, including preparing equipment and supplies, ensuring vehicles and generators are fully fueled and reviewing plans for dam safety checks, utility service restorations and debris removal.

In addition, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have sent teams to work with state officials in the Connecticut EOC, which is located at the William A. O’Neill Armory in Hartford.

Southeastern Connecticut continues to be the area most affected by the storm. Bands of wind and rain began moving through the region this afternoon. As of early evening, the EOC had received no reports of injuries, major damage or widespread power outages. However, the heaviest downpours and highest winds – including gusts potentially as high as 50 mph – are likely later tonight, particularly between 8 p.m. and 11 p.m.

            “We have been well-prepared for this storm – but we have also caught some very lucky breaks,” Governor Rell said. “While still a hurricane and still a threat, the storm has steadily dwindled in intensity. Moreover, it has done so much more rapidly than the forecasts suggested last night or this morning. Hurricane Earl has also kept to the ‘track’ that it was predicted to take. Even a small variation might have meant the storm, no matter how much it has weakened, would have delivered a much more destructive blow.

            “I want to thank all of the first responders, state and local officials, utility representatives and our federal partners for the continued efforts as we wait out this storm,” the Governor said. “We are monitoring every step the storm is taking and will continue to do so until it is well out of Connecticut.”

Posted in Government | Comments Off on Governor Rell: Initial Hours of ‘Earl’ Proceeding Much as Expected

Zogby Poll: DC Lobbyists Often Out of Step with Constituencies

WASHINGTON, Feb. 3 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — A new Zogby poll of senior executives, business owners, and members of union households finds that each of these groups thinks the best way to deal with illegal immigrants in the country is to enforce the law and cause them to return home. This is in stark contrast to lobbyists for large companies, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which argue for legalization. The findings of the survey are consistent with surveys done by the National Federation of Independent Business, which represents small enterprises, showing strong opposition to legalization. Among unions, the leadership strongly supports legalizing illegal immigrants, but this survey shows enforcement — not legalization — is by far the option favored by union members and their families. This survey of likely voters uses neutral language and includes 7,046 members of union households, 2,490 executives (e.g., CEOs, CFOs, VPs or department heads), and 9,990 small business owners.

The full results are at http://www.cis.org/Business-Union-Poll. Among the findings:

When asked to choose between enforcement that would cause illegal immigrants in the country to go home or offering them a pathway to citizenship with conditions, most members of the business community and unions chose enforcement.

  --  Executives (e.g. CEOs, CFOs, VPs etc.): 59 percent support enforcement
      to encourage illegals to go home; 30 percent support conditional
      legalization.
  --  Small Business Owners: 67 percent support enforcement; 22 percent
      support conditional legalization.
  --  Union Households: 58 percent support enforcement; 28 percent support
      conditional legalization.

One of the most interesting findings of the survey is that members of the business community think there are plenty of Americans available to fill unskilled jobs.

  --  Executives: 16 percent said legal immigration should be increased to
      fill unskilled jobs; 61 percent said there are plenty of Americans
      available to do unskilled jobs, employers just need to pay more.
  --  Small Business Owners: 13 percent said increase immigration; 65
      percent said plenty of Americans are available.
  --  Union Households: 10 percent said increase immigration; 72 percent
      said plenty of Americans are available.

Most members of the business community and union households do not feel that illegal immigration is caused by limits on legal immigration, as many of their lobbyists argue; instead, members feel it is due to a lack of enforcement.

  --  Executives: Just 13 percent said illegal immigration is caused by not
      letting in enough legal immigrants; 75 percent said inadequate
      enforcement.
  --  Small Business Owners: 10 percent said not enough legal immigration;
      79 percent said inadequate enforcement.
  --  Union Households: 13 percent said not enough legal immigration; 74
      percent said inadequate enforcement efforts.

In contrast to many businesses group and union leaders, most executives and union members think immigration is too high.

  --  Executives: 63 percent said it is too high; 5 percent said too low; 16
      percent said just right.
  --  Small Business Owners: 70 percent said it is too high; 4 percent said
      too low; 13 percent said just right.
  --  Union Households: 63 percent said immigration is too high; 5 percent
      said too low; 14 percent said just right.

Discussion: The large divide between union members and their leadership on the immigration issue is not really surprising. Union members and their families want higher wages and better working conditions that would likely come from lower levels of immigration. While union leaders also want improved conditions for workers, they see legalized immigrants as potential new members, giving them a different point of view. The divide between some business lobbying groups and their members of the business community on immigration is perhaps more surprising.

The largest business association representing big companies is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber supports “earned legal status leading to legal permanent residency” for illegal immigrants. But when given the options of a conditional legalization or enforcement and illegal immigrants going home, executives and small business owners choose enforcement over legalization two and three to one. As for future levels of immigration the Chamber has made clear that, “We face a larger and larger shortage” of low-skilled workers. The Chamber’s president argues that more immigrant workers are needed, “to fill jobs Americans don’t want.” While the idea of improving wages and working conditions to attract American workers does not seem to have occurred to the Chamber, small business owners and executives consider this the best option. Four to one, executives said if employers can’t find enough workers they should pay more rather than increase immigration levels. For small business owners it was five to one.

The survey reported here might be surprising to some, but the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) states clearly on its website that, based on its survey of members, 79 percent “believe undocumented workers should return to their country and seek admission legally.” Their website goes on to state that “NFIB will not support legislation that contains amnesty for undocumented workers.” Although the Zogby poll discussed here never uses the word “amnesty,” when asked about conditional legalization, versus enforcement, small business owners and executives are clear — immigration laws should be enforced and illegal immigrants should go home.

Methodology: Zogby International was commissioned by the Center for Immigration Studies to conduct an online survey of 42,026 adults. A sampling of Zogby International’s online panel, which is representative of the adult population of the United States, was invited to participate. For small business owners, Zogby asked respondents if they owned a small business. Executives are those who indicated they were either a C-level executive, managing partner, managing director, or served on the board of directors. Persons in union households are either a member of a union themselves or live with someone who is a union member. The survey was conducted by Zogby from November 13 to 30, 2009. The margin of error for all likely voters is +/- 0.5 percent. The margin of error for executives is 2 percent, for small business owners 1 percent, and for those in union households 1.2 percent.

The Center for Immigration Studies is an independent research institution that examines the impact of immigration on the United States.

Source: Center for Immigration Studies

Posted in General | Comments Off on Zogby Poll: DC Lobbyists Often Out of Step with Constituencies

Pictures of Landers Landscaping & Masonry Work

                                                       

More Galleries | Comments Off on Pictures of Landers Landscaping & Masonry Work

Misplaced Compassion And Empathy Regarding Illegal Immigration?

I’ve noticed a number of articles and editorials regarding illegal immigration into our country.  There is often a reference to parents and grandparents who emigrated here from other countries hoping to provide a better life for themselves and their families.  Then a comparison is made with those recent immigrants coming mostly from Central and South America.

Though I can understand the compassion and empathy behind the concern for these recent immigrants, the comparison is like apples and oranges.  My grandparents too came from Europe; (Italy) into this country in the late 1800’s looking for a better life, but they had to abide by, and pass the rigors of the immigration laws; they came here legally.  Family members were sometimes separated for years, some for various reasons, were even sent back to their homeland upon arrival.

We need to obey the laws of the land otherwise there would be chaos. I don’t blame the illegals  for taking the opportunity to come here for a better life, our government gives a wink and a nod as they cross the border, even to this day. But to compare legal immigration with illegal immigration is a slap in the face to those who paid the price to come the right way.

Remember the law to control immigration is a federal law.  Our government is not doing its job by enforcing it.  Arizona, out of necessity is being forced to do what the government refuses to do.  The states should be suing our government to do their job, not the other way around.

Personally, I think that our government allowed, in fact encouraged illegal immigration so as to exploit the hard working cheap labor. I understand that one year the government obtained $7 billion in unclaimed dollars derived from false Social Security accounts.  I recall years ago when a van full of illegals were detained by the local police, who phoned immigration and were told if they did not break the law (although they were already illegal) let them go.  When common citizens calling themselves “Minutemen” voluntarily (without compensation), successfully guarded a portion of our border they were criticized by president Bush as being vigilantes.  Somehow we can protect the sovereignty and integrity of Iraq’s borders but not our own?

For those who are morally and compassionately prompted to assist and support those who are here illegally, depending on the nature of their support, they must realize that they themselves are at risk of violating the law.
This country could not possibly sustain itself if every person in the world could freely enter in without any form of restrictions.  Every single day we witness an attack upon our Judeo Christian heritage, our morality, by those opposed to our way of life.  The ten commandments torn down from our court houses, crosses ripped off of public places after having been up for decades.  Abortions, gay marriage, sexual promiscuity; cultural clashes.  I’m not attributing these things to Hispanics as I realize that most all are moral people.  My point is that there must be some discretion used in determining who and how many people should be entering into our country; there needs to be laws.

We hear that many jobs taken by illegals are jobs Americans refuse to take.  Many illegals are employed by McDonald’s; if they were to leave the country, McDonald’s would not go out of business for lack of employees.  They would have to hire Americans but at higher more acceptable wages.  It’s not that Americans don’t want the jobs, it’s just that they are more savvy and will not be exploited with below standard wages.

One more issue, most every immigrant of the past, entering  this country were proud to become American, they assimilated.  Though they might always have a special place in their heart for their native land, they gave their complete allegiance to the U.S., that is not necessarily the case with all of this new wave of immigrants, even our language is being compromised.

Posted in General | Comments Off on Misplaced Compassion And Empathy Regarding Illegal Immigration?

WHY IS LINDA MCMAHON KEEPING DISTANCE FROM LEGISLATION ON CONCUSSIONS IN HIGH SCHOOL SPORTS?

Because As WWE CEO, She Repeatedly Rejected The Science Motivating This Legislation, Even Though Its Has Been Performed On Her Deceased Performers 

(MYSTIC) – Raj Shah, Communications Director for Simmons for Senate, made the following statement in reaction to a report indicating that though she is a member of the State Board of Education that will oversee new legislation attempting to deal with concussions in high school sports, Linda McMahon refuses to attend the hearing or take a position on the legislation. As CEO of WWE, Linda McMahon has led the company’s systematic efforts to deny the science leading to this legislation and mislead the media about the WWE’s positions and efforts on this issue. This is just the latest example of how her total lack of regard for the health and welfare of her own workers makes her untrustworthy to look after the welfare of Connecticut residents:

“Unfortunately for her workers, in her role as WWE CEO Linda McMahon spent years denying the scientific research that proves repeated undiagnosed concussions among WWE performers presents a potentially deadly risk, all in order to make an extra buck. Now, based on that same science, the Connecticut legislature is considering a bill to protect student athletes from these dangers.

“As a member of the state Board of Education, McMahon would be charged with enforcing provisions of this legislation. McMahon should not be trusted with the health and welfare of Connecticut’s schoolchildren when she is so flagrantly dismissive of the health and welfare of her own workers. Unless McMahon admits that she was wrong to deny the veracity of this scientific research, and until WWE makes sufficient changes to provide for a transparent, independent and effective concussion policy of its own, she should not be allowed to play any role in enforcing this legislation.”

FACTS

Tomorrow, The State Education Committee Will Hold A Hearing On Legislation To Deal With Head Injuries In High School Sports. “On Wednesday afternoon, the legislature’s Education Committee will hold a public hearing on an important bill that aims to address the problem of head injuries in scholastic sports. Essentially, the bill that would require coaches to complete an annual training course on recognizing concussions. It would also require any student who suffers a concussion to get cleared by a doctor before resuming athletic activity.” (Daniela, “Student Athletes, Head Injuries And The WWE,” The Hartford Courant’s “Capitol Watch” Blog, 3/16/10)

The Chairman Of The Senate Education Committee Welcomed Mrs. McMahon To Participate In The Hearing. “State Sen. Tom Gaffey, a Meriden Democrat who co-chairs the committee and is the bill’s leading advocate, said he would welcome McMahon’s input on such an important topic. Perhaps the WWE’s experience in handling head injuries could provide some help to lawmakers as they weigh how to best protect Connecticut’s student athletes.” (Daniela, “Student Athletes, Head Injuries And The WWE,” The Hartford Courant’s “Capitol Watch” Blog, 3/16/10)

Gaffney: “Certainly she’s a member of the state Board of Education and she operate[d] a huge entertainment conglomerate where presumably the participants in that entertainment venue can suffer serious concussions from time to time. … I would welcome her opinions…I would think as a member of the state board of education that she would have an opinion as regards to the protection of student athletes. I would hope she would have opinion.” (Daniela, “Student Athletes, Head Injuries And The WWE,” The Hartford Courant’s “Capitol Watch” Blog, 3/16/10)

Her Excuse For Not Taking A Position Is That She Hasn’t Seen The Bill. McMahon Campaign: “She cannot say specifically what her position is on this until she first has a chance to look at the bill and preferably read it.” (Daniela, “Student Athletes, Head Injuries And The WWE,” The Hartford Courant’s “Capitol Watch” Blog 3/16/10)

Linda McMahon And WWE Have Rejected The Science Linking Head Injuries To Long Term Brain Trauma Conducted On Her Own Former Performers Underpinning The Legislation

Dr. Bennet Omalu, Co-Director Of The Brain Research Institute Said Deceased WWE Wrestlers Andrew “Test” Martin And Chris Benoit Suffered From Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), From Repeated Blows To The Head. “Dr. Bennet Omalu, co-director of the Brain Injury Research Institute, told ESPN.com on Monday that Martin suffered from brain damage — a syndrome he has defined as chronic traumatic encephalopathy — stemming from repeated blows to the head. Martin is the second former wrestler to be linked to CTE; Benoit was the first.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,”12/8/09)

Omalu Has Seen The Same Conditions In 20 Athletes, Among Them Boxers Who Suffer Repeated Head Blows. “Omalu said he conducted an analysis of Martin’s brain tissues back in April and discovered excessive amounts of tau proteins similar to those he found in Benoit — and now a rising total of 20 dead athletes. This same chemical imbalance is found in a number of former boxers and known as dementia pugilistica or punch-drunk syndrome. The brains of Benoit and Martin, Omalu said, resembled those of Alzheimer’s patients more than twice their age.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,” 12/8/09)

Omalu: “After repeated blows to the head, at some point the brain loses the ability to heal itself. … The tau impairs normal brain function and kills brain cells. The delicate balance of the neurotransmitters, which control moods and drives and maintains satiety, can be destroyed.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,” 12/8/09)

WWE Statement: “While this is a new emerging science, the WWE is unaware of the veracity of any of these tests, be it for Chris Benoit or Andrew Martin. Dr. Omalu claims that Mr. Benoit had a brain that resembled an 85-year-old with Alzheimer’s, which would lead one to ponder how Mr. Benoit would have found his way to an airport, let alone been able to remember all the moves and information that is required to perform in the ring.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,” 12/8/09)

Linda McMahon: “These Studies Have Not Been Proven, If You Will.” CNN’s DREW GRIFFIN: “There is a lot of information coming out on the research that was done on Chris [Benoit]‘s brain. … [W]e had our own neurologist on staff, CNN, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, he looked at the slides, and he couldn’t believe what he was seeing. He couldn’t believe the damage mirrored an 85-year-old man who had either Alzheimer’s, or dementia, or something like that.” LINDA MCMAHON: “These studies have not been proven, if you will.” (“McMahons: WWE Not To Blame For Benoit’s Actions,” www.cnn.com, 11/7/07)

 

McMahon Compares WWE’s Concussion Policy To That Of The NFL, Even Though The NFL Has Overhauled Its Policy As A Result Of This New Science

Linda McMahon Compares WWE’s Concussion Policy To That Of The NFL. “WWE has one of the most comprehensive health and wellness policies that is in place which goes to safety issues … impact testing for concussions that is the same program that is utilized by the NFL.” (Talk 104.7 WXLM’s, “The Lee Elci Morning Show,” 1/14/10)

The NFL Has Accepted This Research And As A Result, Overhauled Its Concussion Policy. “Last week [NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell] sent a memo to all 32 teams outlining a stricter concussion protocol. Players who suffer a concussion and display certain signs and symptoms should not return to a game, he wrote; previously, the standard was losing consciousness. Additionally, teams were required to consult with independent neurologists, rather than relying solely on their own doctors in assessing concussion cases.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,” 12/9/09)

WWE Falsely Claimed It Had Not Been Given An Opportunity To See These Findings

WWE Said It “Has Been Asking To See The Research And Tests Results In The Case Of Mr. Benoit For Years And Has Not Been Supplied With Them.” “WWE has been asking to see the research and tests results in the case of Mr. Benoit for years and has not been supplied with them.” (Greg Garber, “Doctors: Wrestler Had Brain Damage,” 12/8/09)

WWE Physician Dr. Maroon Met With Omalu At The Brain Injury Research Institute In October 2008.“On October 1, 2008, Dr. Maroon visited the Brain Injury Research Institute in Morgantown, West Virginia. The institute is co-directed by Dr. Julian Bailes, chair of the neurosurgery department at West Virginia University, and Dr. Omalu, a medical professor and coroner now based in California. Also present at the meeting were the brain institute’s general counsel, Bob Fitzsimmons, and Peter Davies, a professor of pathology and neuroscience at Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York.” (Irvin Muchnick, “Exclusive: Linda McMahon’s WWE Medical Director Met With Chris Benoit Brain Experts In 2008,” 12/14/09)

Omalu: “Dr. Maroon Was There With Us And He Was Shown All Our Research Information, Slides, And Specimens – On Chris Benoit And All The Athletes’ Brains We Studied.” “On the phone with me this morning, Omalu was hopping mad about the WWE statement to ESPN. ‘Dr. Maroon was there with us and he was shown all our research information, slides, and specimens – on Chris Benoit and all the athletes’ brains we studied,’ Omalu said.” (Irvin Muchnick, “Exclusive: Linda McMahon’s WWE Medical Director Met With Chris Benoit Brain Experts In 2008,”12/14/09)

Though WWE Claims Chair Shot To The Head Are No Longer Allowed, The WWE’s 2009 Tables, Ladders And Chairs Match Shows The Company Still Allows Brutal Blows To The Head

WWE Website: “The WWE has eliminated using folding metal chairs to ‘strike’ an opponent in the head.” (WWE, corporate.wwe.com, Accessed 3/16/10)

Watch Highlights Of WWE’s 2009 Tables, Ladders And Chairs Event Showing Brutal Chair Shots To The Head

And Like The Rest Of WWE’s So-Called “Wellness Policy,” Any And All WWE Efforts To Mitigate Head Trauma Lack Transparency And Independence, Allowing The Company To Mislead The Public

Congress’s Investigation Found That WWE Steroid Testing Policies “Suffer From A Lack Of Independence And Transparency.” “Since the Committee began its investigation last year, both the WWE and the TNA have made efforts to improve their steroid testing programs. But these efforts suffer from a lack of independence and transparency. As a result of these weaknesses, the organizations appear unable to effectively prevent the use of steroids and other illegal drugs by professional wrestlers.” (Chairman Henry Waxman, Committee On Oversight And Government Reform, Letter To The Office Of National Drug Control Policy, 1/2/09)

Pro Wrestling Torch’s James Caldwell: “Bottom Line Is The Wellness Policy Lacks Transparency. Their Policy Is Words On A Piece Of Paper Unless They Disclose The Application Of The Policy…” “Caldwell’s Analysis: Bottom line is the Wellness Policy lacks transparency. Their policy is words on a piece of paper unless they disclose the application of the policy, which I wrote about several weeks. WWE has no statistics on their website identifying the application of their Head Tramua/Concussion testing policy, for example. Meanwhile, wrestlers associated with WWE at one time have continued to die at an alarming rate. Zimmerman brought up the NFL and NHL, which have off-seasons and guaranteed time off to heal mentally and physically. That’s one key difference between the sports. Where’s the transparency from WWE on why they don’t have mandatory off-seasons for all talent built into their Wellness Policy?” (James Caldwell, “WWE News: Linda McMahon’s Senate Opponent Counting Down Lack Of Answers, WWE Responds To Steroid Story,” pwtorch.com, 3/5/10)

The Lack Of Transparency Has Allowed The Company To Repeatedly Mislead The Public And Media About Its Wellness Policy

Days After The Benoit Murder-Suicide, When Asked About WWE’s Steroid Use, Linda McMahon Stated “We Have Always Had, You Know, A Drug Policy Since The Late ’80s.” “ABC NEWS’ ROBIN ROBERTS: “I’m sure that you’re aware of what some people have said about the profession of wrestling and even some of those have been inside, like the ex-wife of Stone Cold Steve Austin, his wife who said that she was abused by him, talks about the, the prevalence of – steroid use with wrestling, some people saying as high as 75% of the wrestlers. Are you aware, and what, what is the WWE doing?” MCMAHON: “Well, I can only speak for the WWE in terms of our, you know, in our profession. And we have always had, you know, a drug policy since the late ’80s.” (ABC News’ “Good Morning America,” 6/28/07)

  • In Fact, The Congressional Investigation Found WWE’s Steroid Testing Was Suspended From When 1996 Until 2006, One Year Prior To the Statement. “According to documents provided to the Committee, the WWE had a steroids testing program in the 1990s that was eliminated in 1996, On October 25, 1996, the WWE’s Chairman and CEO, Vince McMahon, issued a memo explaining his decision. The memo stated: ‘the incidence of illegal and performance enhancing drugs is so slight that group testing is no longer cost effective or necessary.’ In March 2006, Mr. McMahon reinstituted the steroids testing program after press reports suggested that the death of popular V/WE wrestler Eddie Guerrero four months earlier was linked to steroid abuse.” (Chairman Henry Waxman, Committee On Oversight And Government Reform, Letter To The Office Of National Drug Control Policy, 1/2/09)

In Wake Of News That During His Autopsy, Chris Benoit Tested Positive For Testosterone Use, WWE Issued A Misleading Statement Implying That Based On Its Testing, Benoit Had Only Begun Taking Testosterone In The Previous Few Months Without The Company’s Knowledge. “WWE understands that the toxicology reports for Chris Benoit indicate that he tested positive for testosterone and negative for anabolic steroids. On Mr. Benoit’s last drug test in April 2007 administered by Aegis Labs, he tested negative for anabolic steroids and for testosterone. Given the toxicology report of GBI released today, it would appear that Mr. Benoit took testosterone sometime after his April 2007 test and the time he died. WWE understands that his dealings with Dr. Astin are currently being investigated, and WWE has no knowledge of whether Dr. Astin prescribed testosterone for Mr. Benoit at some point after the April 2007 tests.” (WWE, “World Wrestling Entertainment Issue Statement,” Press Release, 7/17/07)

  • In Fact Of His Four Total Tests, In Three He Tested Positive For Testosterone And There Was “No Evidence Indicating That Efforts Were Made By WWE To Discourage His Steroid Use.” “As part of the Committee’s inquiry, the Committee sought information about any steroid testing involving Chris Benoit, the wrestler who killed himself and his wife and son in June 2007. WWE officials informed the Committee that Mr. Benoit was tested four times under the WWE program, He tested positive three times. He received no suspensions or other penalties as a result of these positive tests, and the Committee obtained no evidence indicating that efforts were made by WWE to discourage his steroid use.” (Chairman Henry Waxman, Committee On Oversight And Government Reform, Letter To The Office Of National Drug Control Policy, 1/2/09)

On March 19, 2007, Sports Illustrated Told WWE Of Documents From A Federal Investigation Implicating Several WWE Wrestlers Of Using Human Growth Hormone (HGH) And Anabolic Steroids. “According to the documents two prominent wrestlers, Adam Copeland, a.k.a. Edge, and Shane Helms, a.k.a. The Hurricane, received HGH. (Through the WWE, Copeland and Helms didn’t respond to a request for comment.) But virtually all the others allegedly received a wide variety of anabolic steroids. In each case these were supplied by Applied, the Mobile, Ala., compounding pharmacy that was raided last fall. … Wilbirt also allegedly issued prescriptions for the steroids nandrolone and stanozolol to Oscar Gutierrez, whose stage name is Rey Mysterio. (Through the WWE, Gutierrez declined comment.) … Consider Randy Orton, who allegedly received eight prescriptions for six different drugs — stanozolol, nandrolone, anastrozole, Clomiphene citrate, oxandrolone and testosterone — between March 2004 and August 2004. (Through the WWE, Orton declined comment.)” (Luis Fernando Llosa and L. Jon Wertheim, “Wrestlers Allegedly Tied To Drug Ring,” Sports Illustrated, 3/19/07)

WWE Told Sports Illustrated That Drug Use Was Not Permitted, But That It Could Not Reveal And Disciplinary Actions The Company Took Due To Privacy Concerns. SI.COM: “Does the WWE have a drug policy?” LLOSA/WERTHEIM: “Gary Davis, a WWE spokesman, pointed us to a Talent Wellness Program instituted in February 2006. As to whether anabolic steroids and HGH are banned, Davis sent us an email quoting the policy: ‘The WWE policy prohibits the use of performance-enhancing drugs, as well as other prescription drugs which can be abused, if taken for other than a legitimate medical purpose pursuant to a valid prescription from a licensed and treating physician. For purposes of WWE’s policy, prescriptions obtained over the Internet and/or from suppliers of prescription drugs from the Internet are not considered to have been given for a legitimate medical purpose.’ Citing privacy issues, Davis declined to say whether WWE wrestlers have tested positive for banned substances since the policy was implemented.” (Luis Fernando Llosa and L. Jon Wertheim, “Wrestlers Allegedly Tied To Drug Ring,” Sports Illustrated, 3/19/07)

  • Five Months Later, We Learned The WWE Took No Disciplinary Action Until It Was Under Congressional Investigation. (T.J. Quinn, “Top WWE Names Emerge In Doping Scandal,” New York Daily News, 8/30/07)

simmonsportrait

Posted in General | Comments Off on WHY IS LINDA MCMAHON KEEPING DISTANCE FROM LEGISLATION ON CONCUSSIONS IN HIGH SCHOOL SPORTS?

CONNECTICUT NATIONAL GUARD SUFFERS COMBAT FATALITY

HARTFORD, Conn., – Maj. Gen. Thaddeus J. Martin, Adjutant General and Commander of the Connecticut National Guard confirmed today, with much regret and sorrow, that a member of A Company, 1st Battalion, 102nd Infantry Regiment of Norwalk died late Tuesday night at the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md.

ctngnov2009

Staff Sgt. Edwin Rivera, 28, of Waterford, Conn., died as a result of wounds sustained when enemy forces attacked his unit with indirect fire on May 20 in Laghman Province, Afghanistan.

“The loss of Staff Sgt. Rivera, so close to the traditional Memorial Day weekend serves as a painful reminder to all of us, of the sacrifices young American heroes and their families are called upon to make on our behalf. For what Staff Sgt. Rivera has done in service to his state and nation makes him well deserving of the term hero,” said Martin.

The 1st Battalion, 102nd Infantry Regiment is currently deployed to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. The 102nd Infantry, as part of the 86th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) Mountain (MTN), is partnered with Afghan security forces to assist, train and mentor the Afghan Army, Police and Border Police forces in order to strengthen, stabilize and legitimize the Government of Afghanistan.

The 1st Battalion, 102nd Infantry was alerted in January 2008, mobilized in November 2009 and departed Connecticut on November 21, 2009 for Camp Atterbury, Ind. for further training and validation. The Battalion left for Afghanistan in January 2010.

Currently, the Connecticut National Guard has 900 Soldiers and Airmen deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.

The 1st Battalion, 102nd Infantry is scheduled to return home in the fall 2010.

Posted in General | Comments Off on CONNECTICUT NATIONAL GUARD SUFFERS COMBAT FATALITY